I’ve been reading quite a bit of non-fiction science lately — mathematics, history, the philosophy of science — and for a small break from the density of that material (quick: why do the non-trivial Riemann zeros lie across the critical line whose real part is one half?) I decided to re-read a book that I retrieved from the bookshelves a few months ago, for some now-forgotten purpose, and which has since been migrating across the piles of stuff on my bedside table: Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle.
One of the first surprising items I discovered was the original price sticker, from when I purchased this book, in 1985, from the UBC bookstore: $2.95. My, how times have changed.
The Man in the High Castle is one of the first alternative histories. Though Dick is considered a writer of sci-fi (and films of his work, such as Blade Runner and Minority Report are certainly within that eclectic genre), TMITHC is not science fiction in the strict sense: it’s not about the future, there is no advanced technology to speak of, and no extraterrestrial aspects come into play. No, TMITHC is about a world — our world, but not quite — in which the Nazis won the second world war. This is a theme that has recently been taken up by Philip Roth as well, in his The Plot Against America; but Dick was among the first to explore such alternate universes.
It was refreshing to revisit TMITHC after more than twenty years. The story is simply told, without the postmodern tropes and adornments that one finds in almost all literature today. Dick does not trick the reader with overlapping perspectives, or knots of fancy language, or strategies of symbolism cobbled together from simple psychologies. He does not try to untangle the mystery of the story: which is that our world and the alternative world both exist, somehow, and are connected by means of various bridges: the arts, spirituality, philosophy.
The language of the book is interesting: Dick uses a pidgin-ish narrative both for his descriptions of scenes and for the internal dialogue of most of the characters (except those who seem to understand the nature of their interpenetrating realities). It’s as though he’s asking the reader to narrow down modes of thought, to restrict imagination and creativity in the manner demanded of the society inhabited by the characters. It’s an interesting approach; subtle, and quite effective.
In many ways, TMITHC is an abstract book. Its generous use of the I Ching — or, perhaps, its dependence on the flow of energies within the I Ching — will be off-putting to some readers, as will the generally Jungian approach to self-psychology. But for those with a philosophic frame of mind, TMITHC is a great book. The story is clear, and strong, and an unbiased reader will be carried by its momentum. And within this trajectory, the reader is asked to consider profound questions about the nature of reality, the nature of character, and the manner in which human societies grow. TMITHC is a traditional narrative, a narrative of the old school, in which the asking of big questions was not yet considered quaint.
One scene of the book is of particular interest to me as a counsellor. It involves a character who comes into possession of a small pendant, upon which he meditates, and which leads him, momentarily, across the bridge between his world and ours. He crosses over, returns again to his own reality, and is changed. In his own life, Philip K. Dick underwent a number of altered state experiences — what might be called psychotic breaks, in fact — over several years following dental surgery in 1974. These may have been provoked by his frequent use of stimulants or by his own underlying temperament, which seemed prone to the types of internal splits seen often in artists and writers. At any rate, here is how Dick described one of those experiences:
My novel Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said was released by Doubleday in February of 1974. The week after it was released, I had two impacted wisdom teeth removed, under sodium pentathol. Later that day I found myself in intense pain. My wife phoned the oral surgeon and he phoned a pharmacy. Half an hour later there was a knock at my door: the delivery person from the pharmacy with the pain medication. Although I was bleeding and sick and weak, I felt the need to answer the knock on the door myself. When I opened the door, I found myself facing a young woman — who wore a shining gold necklace in the center of which was a gleaming gold fish. For some reason I was hypnotized by the gleaming golden fish; I forgot my pain, forgot the medication, forgot why the girl was there. I just kept staring at the fish sign.
“What does that mean?” I asked her.
The girl touched the glimmering golden fish with her hand and said, “This is a sign worn by the early Christians.” She then gave me the package of medication.
In that instant, as I stared at the gleaming fish sign and heard her words, I suddenly experienced what I later learned is called anamnesis—a Greek word meaning, literally, “loss of forgetfulness.” I remembered who I was and where I was. In an instant, in the twinkling of an eye, it all came back to me. And not only could I remember it but I could see it. The girl was a secret Christian and so was I. We lived in fear of detection by the Romans. We had to communicate with cryptic signs. She had just told me all this, and it was true.
TMITHC was published in the early sixties. Dick’s encounter with the woman above took place in 1974. The scene in TMITHC is essentially identical to what happened to him almost fifteen years later. I wonder about this; it intrigues me. It’s as though an underground stream ran through the narrative of his life, weaving in and out of his books, following him into the reality of his own life, prompting questions from him about his own identity, his reality, his consciousness.
Today, Dick would have trouble getting TMITHC published. There’s no hook to it, it’s too abstract for most readers, it requires a contemplative approach to reading. Where’s the market for such a book? Perhaps I’m being cynical — but it is my belief that many of the classic books would not make it onto the shelves today. Now that publishing is an appendage of the entertainment industry, books are no longer the culture bearers they once were. Movies now occupy that position. At least they do for the most part. Yet sometimes, great books still exert their own power, beyond marketing and franchises and the mercurial public. There’s no question in my mind that The Man in the High Castle is such a book.