Trauma-Informed Exhibition Planning

Exhibitions at museums often carry a dual mandate: to present difficult content with honesty and accuracy, and to do so in ways that respect the emotional well-being of visitors. This balance is not simple. Exhibitions about genocide, systemic racism, or residential schools cannot be softened without compromising truth, yet they must be approached with sensitivity to avoid retraumatization. The aspiration is not to eliminate discomfort but to ensure that discomfort does not overwhelm. A trauma-informed approach to exhibition planning seeks to create conditions where visitors can encounter difficult truths while still feeling supported, safe, and respected.

Labyrinths, Dark Forests, and Guides in the Darkness

Cultural and artistic traditions across the world speak of the journey through darkness. Often they speak of a labyrinth—not a maze designed to disorient but a single winding path that leads to a center, a place of stillness and perhaps of transformation. The labyrinth acknowledges that the journey through difficult territory is not linear. We double back, we circle, we feel lost even when we are on the path. But there is always a center, and there is always a way out.

The dark forest appears in myth and fairy tale as the place where the hero confronts the unknown. Dante's Inferno begins "in a dark wood, for the straight way was lost." The dark forest is the place where we meet the parts of ourselves we have disowned or feared. The monsters we encounter there are often aspects of ourselves (our shadows, to use the Jungian viewpoint), waiting to be recognized and integrated. Trauma works this way too: the wound carries wisdom, if we can bear to look at it.

Guides in the darkness—Virgil leading Dante, shamans accompanying initiates, the wise woman at the edge of the forest—offer presence without rescue. They do not make the journey for us, but they walk beside us. They carry their own light, steady and calm, and in that steadiness we find the courage to continue. Museum staff, in a trauma-informed practice, play this role. Not experts who know all the answers, but companions who can hold space, who can say I see you are struggling, and I am here.

Integrating Creative Exploration into the Museum Journey

What would it look like to weave creativity, play, and exploration into the architecture of the museum? Not as a distraction from difficult content but as an integration with it? Not as sanitizing or softening but as offering pathways for visitors to metabolize what they encounter?

Stations for reflection are one possibility, but they could go deeper. Imagine alcoves where visitors are invited to pause and create. Not elaborate projects requiring hours, but simple, tactile engagements: arranging stones into cairns, writing a word or phrase on a slip of paper and placing it in a collective bowl, molding clay into a small shape, adding a bead to a communal string. These are gestures of making, small acts that allow the hand to process what the mind cannot yet articulate.

For children, this approach is especially powerful. Children often struggle with the abstract and verbal presentation of trauma narratives. They may not understand the historical context of genocide or systemic racism, but they can understand the process of building something beautiful together, of carrying light, of helping one another. In this sense, the museum can be not just a place of learning but a place of doing, together.

This approach also honors the reality that not everyone processes trauma through language and cognition. Some people need movement, touch, rhythm, making. The hand knows things the mind does not. Working with objects—folding paper, tying string, arranging elements—engages a different kind of intelligence, one that is somatic and intuitive. This is why art therapy and wilderness therapy have such power in trauma recovery. The body, given something to do, begins to regulate itself. The hands, given materials to shape, find expression for what cannot be spoken.

Balancing Truth and Hope

Exhibitions must balance narratives of harm with narratives of resilience. Ideally, for every story of oppression, visitors encounter stories of survival, resistance, or cultural continuity. This balance does not erase pain but situates it within the larger human capacity for endurance and creativity.

In practice, some histories are dominated by loss, and curators may fear diluting truth with false positivity. The challenge is to avoid what might be called "redemptive arcs" that minimize harm or suggest easy resolution. Real trauma does not resolve neatly. Real injustice is not always followed by justice. And yet, even in the most brutal histories, people found ways to survive, to preserve culture, to resist, to retain their humanity. These stories deserve space too — not as denials of darkness but as acknowledgment that even in the darkest moments, people create beauty, tell stories, care for one another, hold onto hope. Small lights in the darkness, carried by hand.

Providing Options and Choice

One of the most effective strategies is to give visitors choice in how they engage. Ideally, exhibitions should offer multiple pathways, including alternate routes, visible exits, and clearly marked areas where visitors can pause or bypass difficult material. Content advisories at the start of galleries should provide information so visitors can make informed decisions.

Even small gestures communicate respect for choice: signage that says You can take your time here or It's okay to step outside for a break or This next section contains graphic images; you may choose to continue, pause, or skip ahead.

Choice returns agency to visitors. Trauma, fundamentally, involves a loss of control. Trauma-informed practice seeks to restore control wherever possible, even in small ways. The visitor who can say I need to sit here for a moment or I'm going to skip this gallery and rejoin my group later is a visitor who retains some measure of autonomy in a space that could otherwise feel overwhelming.

The Role of Language

Language in text panels and interpretation carries great weight. Ideally, it should be invitational: You may wish to reflect on... rather than prescriptive: You should recognize... Invitational language respects autonomy and acknowledges that visitors bring their own perspectives, their own histories, their own capacities for engagement.

In practice, curatorial traditions favor authoritative tones. Museums have long positioned themselves as holders of knowledge, as experts who educate a less-informed public. But trauma-informed practice invites a shift: toward language that is accessible, open-ended, yet still accurate. Language that invites visitors into relationship with the content rather than positioning them as passive recipients. Language that acknowledges multiple truths, multiple perspectives, especially in consultation with affected communities.

Designing for Emotional Regulation

Visitors encountering traumatic content need ways to regulate their emotions. Ideally, exhibitions provide moments of sensory balance: quiet spaces, natural light, softer soundscapes, reflective installations. These are not escapes from content but opportunities for the nervous system to resettle before continuing.

In practice, such features may be limited by budget or design priorities. The aspiration is to advocate for at least modest supports—benches, alcoves, tactile grounding objects—that signal care and allow self-regulation. These could be intentionally designed as regulation spaces: places to sit, to breathe, to look out windows, to touch something textured or cool. Pausing to gather materials, to touch paper or wood or stone, to focus on a simple task—these actions help the nervous system downregulate after intense exposure. They provide a rhythm: encounter difficult content, pause and gather, continue, pause and gather again. The rhythm itself becomes regulating.

Content Advisories and Framing

Content advisories are more than warnings; they are tools of respect. Ideally, advisories are clear, specific, and invitational: This section contains survivor testimony about violence. You may choose to continue, pause, or take an alternate route. This language acknowledges both the reality of what lies ahead and the visitor's agency in deciding how to proceed.

The language of content advisories matters profoundly. While it is crucial to inform visitors that exhibition content may be emotionally activating, museums also incur a secondary risk in doing so: the warnings will provoke emotions, and those emotions will be somewhat contagious. This is the same mechanism at work in the strategy of effective band-aid removal: if you let people know that this might hurt, it probably will. The middle ground here is to inform but not alarm, to give visitors options and reminders of their own capacity. Prior warning messages work best when they use language that emphasizes self-regulation and resilience, that reinforces freedom of approach with judgment and self-awareness.

In general, words such as caution, warning, and stop! will tend to increase anxiety and activation. Trigger warning is particularly problematic. Conversely, words such as remember, care, connect, and practice are likely to encourage visitors to apply the emotional skills that will assist them in navigating the current moment.

Preparedness for the possibility of strong emotion is crucial whenever visitors are welcomed into a museum environment that contains provocative material. Surprise is the enemy of calm. Surprised and emotionally activated visitors lose their self-regulation and often their ability to control basic behavior. The healthiest environment is one in which visitors are encouraged to be open to provocation but not corralled by it, facilitated toward emotional awareness but not overwhelmed by it. The duty of care, for a museum working therapeutically, is to stay within a range that in the mental health field is termed safe enough: uncomfortable, perhaps, even highly intensive and activating—but as long as visitors remain in control, as long as they are not hostage to dissociation, freezing, hypervigilance, or anger, they can (usually) navigate safely.

Advisories as Invitations to Engagement

Content advisories should not function as signals to disengage or avoid. Rather, they are opportunities for deeper, more conscious engagement. When visitors encounter an advisory before entering a space, they are being invited to pause, to take stock of their own emotional state, to make an informed choice about how they wish to proceed. This pause—this moment of reflection—is itself a form of self-regulation. It allows visitors to gather their resources, to remember their own capacity, to decide whether they are ready to encounter what lies ahead.

This is fundamentally different from the transactional model in which advisories simply warn visitors away. In a trauma-informed approach, advisories acknowledge that visitors may choose to encounter difficult content because it matters to them, because it connects to their own histories, because they want to bear witness. The advisory respects this choice while also preparing visitors for what that choice entails. It says: You can do this. Here's what to expect. Here's how to take care of yourself along the way.

From this perspective, content advisories become ecological and relational. They are part of the broader system of supports that help visitors navigate emotionally activating material. They work in concert with other elements: the presence of trained staff, the availability of safe spaces for reflection, the rhythm and pacing of the exhibition itself. An advisory is not a standalone intervention but one thread in a larger web of care.

Research on Content Advisories

Recent research suggests that content advisories do not deter visitors from engaging with difficult material. In fact, some studies indicate that well-crafted advisories may actually encourage engagement, particularly among visitors who have experienced trauma themselves. These visitors appreciate being given information that allows them to prepare, to make choices, to feel a sense of control over their experience. They are more likely to enter a space when they know what to expect and when they trust that the institution has thought carefully about their well-being.

A comprehensive meta-analysis of trigger and content warnings found that warnings do not reduce emotional distress or increase avoidance of difficult material (Bridgland et al., 2023). In some cases, warnings actually increased engagement with potentially distressing content—a "forbidden fruit" effect that made the material more rather than less appealing. These findings challenge the common assumption that advisories will drive visitors away or diminish attendance. Instead, they suggest that advisories—when done well—should signal care, thoughtfulness, and respect.

Research with trauma survivors specifically has shown that traditional trigger warnings do not help people prepare emotionally for difficult content and may even increase anticipatory anxiety (Jones et al., 2020). However, this does not mean advisories are ineffective; rather, it highlights the importance of how they are framed. Warnings that emphasize external threat tend to heighten anxiety, while advisories that emphasize visitor agency and self-awareness create a different invitation entirely.

The key is in the framing. Advisories that focus on external threat—Warning: graphic content ahead—tend to heighten anxiety and may indeed discourage engagement. But advisories that emphasize visitor agency and self-awareness—You decide how much of this to see. Some visitors have strong reactions. Your reactions are unique to you—position the visitor as capable, as someone who can navigate difficult terrain with intention and care.

Language That Centers Agency

Positive and helpful messages tend to have the following character:

• Please take care of yourself
• You decide how deep to go
• If you need a break, take one
• You may (or may not) have strong reactions
• Your reactions are unique to you
• It's OK to be emotional
• If you need help, ask a person you trust
• Participate and engage in your own way
• Learn and be safe

These phrases share several features. They use the language of choice and agency: you decide, you may choose, in your own way. They normalize emotional responses without prescribing what those responses should be. They acknowledge that not everyone will react the same way. They emphasize self-care without dictating how that care should look. And they remind visitors of resources—trusted people, breaks, options—without overwhelming them with information.

Importantly, these messages do not avoid naming what visitors might encounter. A content advisory should still be specific: This gallery contains testimonies about sexual violence. You may see graphic photographs. Some visitors find this material deeply affecting. Specificity allows visitors to make informed choices. But the specificity is paired with reminders of agency: You may choose to continue, pause, or take an alternate route.

Beyond Information: The Need for Human Connection

Simply providing information about how to call a crisis line or where to find mental health resources is not generally helpful for visitors in moments of emotional activation. What is needed, instead, is engagement with museum staff who are trained in empathic responding. A phone number on a wall cannot offer what a present, calm, attentive person can offer: the stabilizing experience of being seen, heard, and met in one's distress.

The skills of empathy and active listening require a blend of self-awareness and attentiveness to others. Emotional reciprocity and sharing are at the core of empathy, and its effective use has an inherently stabilizing function on almost everyone. Building skill in empathy also entails developing the skill of self-regulation. In turn, empathy and self-regulation contribute to self-awareness, the most important psychological skill of all.

This is why the presence of trained staff near potentially activating content is so crucial. A staff member standing near a difficult exhibit, calm and available, invites a different quality of experience than an empty room, however well-designed. That staff member becomes part of the advisory system—not through words alone but through presence. They signal: I am here. You are not alone. If you need support, I can offer it.

Training staff in these skills is not simple. Active and empathic listening skills are extraordinarily complex. The activation of empathy in a listener also requires activation and awareness of their own emotional state, their resonance with the speaker as well as the resonance of the subject matter with the listener's own history. The listener's beliefs, biases, and judgments must be laid aside, during the practice of listening—which means they must be grappled with, mapped, and known prior to the interview. Effective listening—active, empathic, supportive—is a deep skill that requires much self-awareness, mentorship, and practice.

However, museum staff can develop excellent skills in empathy and active listening. With training, they can learn to notice when a visitor is becoming activated, to offer simple, grounding interventions, to guide someone to a quieter space or to a colleague who can provide additional support. The goal is not to turn all staff into therapists but to equip them with the foundational skills to offer human connection in moments when it matters most.

Safe Spaces for Reflection and Processing

Content advisories work best when paired with the availability of safe—or safe enough—spaces where visitors can go to pause, reflect, and process what they have encountered. These are not escapes from content but opportunities for the nervous system to resettle before continuing. Ideally, exhibitions provide moments of sensory balance: quiet spaces, natural light, softer soundscapes, reflective installations.

A safe space does not need to be elaborate. It can be as simple as a bench positioned near a window, an alcove with softer lighting, a small side room with a few chairs and perhaps some natural elements—plants, wood, stone. What matters is that the space feels different from the intensity of the exhibition galleries. It offers sensory relief: quieter, slower, gentler. And it offers permission: It's okay to be here. It's okay to rest.

Signage can reinforce this permission. A sign near such a space might read: This is a place to pause. You can sit here as long as you need. Such small gestures communicate that the museum understands the need for regulation and respects visitors' rhythms of engagement.

Implementation in Practice

In practice, advisories are inconsistently applied or vaguely worded. The aspiration is to normalize advisories as standard practice, so visitors expect them as a sign of care rather than avoidance. For museums, advisories could appear not only at gallery entrances but also at specific exhibits within galleries, giving visitors ongoing information about what they are about to encounter. Digital guides or apps could allow visitors to preview content before entering a space, making more informed choices about their own pacing and exposure.

Consider a visitor approaching the residential schools exhibition. Before entering, they encounter an advisory panel. The language is specific but invitational: This gallery tells the stories of residential school survivors. You will see photographs, hear testimonies, and encounter objects that bear witness to trauma and loss. Some visitors find this material deeply affecting. You may experience strong emotions—sadness, anger, grief—and that is okay. Take your time. Rest when you need to. There are benches throughout the gallery and a quiet reflection space at the far end. Museum staff are here if you need support.

This advisory does several things. It names what visitors will encounter, specifically and honestly. It normalizes emotional responses. It reminds visitors of their agency: Take your time. Rest when you need to. It points to resources: benches, a reflection space, staff. And it does all of this in language that is clear, direct, and grounded in care.

Inside the gallery, additional advisories might appear before particularly intense content: The next section contains survivor testimonies about physical and sexual abuse. You may choose to listen, to read the transcripts, or to move forward to the next area. Again, the language is specific and offers choice. It acknowledges the difficulty of the material while trusting visitors to know what they need.

Training and Organizational Structure

For content advisories to function as tools of engagement rather than deterrence, they must be embedded within a broader organizational culture that values trauma-informed practice. This means training staff not only to understand the purpose of advisories but also to embody the principles behind them. It means recognizing that advisories are not bureaucratic compliance measures but expressions of care. And it means continually revisiting and refining advisory language based on visitor feedback and staff experience.

Staff should be invited to contribute: _What language works well for you? What do visitors ask about? What seems to help?_ Advisories should be living documents, revised regularly to incorporate this learning. And staff should be supported in their own emotional labor through supervision, peer support, and opportunities for reflection. Healthy organizational culture is the best protection against compassion fatigue. In such an environment, staff and volunteers communicate effectively, are aware of each other's emotional status, and find many ways of supporting one another in stressful situations.

Content advisories, when done well, are acts of care that invite deeper engagement rather than avoidance. They prepare visitors for emotionally activating material by centering their agency, normalizing their responses, and reminding them of available supports. They work best when paired with trained staff who can offer empathic presence and with safe spaces where visitors can pause to reflect and regulate. And they function most effectively when embedded within a trauma-informed organizational culture that values visitor wellbeing as much as educational mission.

The goal is not to shield visitors from difficult material but to create conditions in which they can encounter that material with intention, awareness, and support. When visitors feel prepared, when they retain a sense of choice, when they know that help is available if they need it—they are more likely to engage deeply, to stay present, to allow the content to affect them in ways that matter. This is the promise of trauma-informed practice: not comfort, necessarily, but the possibility of meaningful encounter within a framework of care.

Collaboration with Community Voices

Trauma-informed planning benefits from collaboration with those whose stories are told. Ideally, community partners are involved in shaping narrative arcs, reviewing text, and selecting artifacts. This is especially true for exhibitions dealing with residential schools, Indigenous histories, and ongoing struggles for justice.

In practice, collaboration may be constrained by time or divergent perspectives within communities. The aspiration is to maintain respectful, ongoing dialogue, even when it slows the process, because trust and safety are strengthened through inclusion.

(For more information about facilitating community conversations, see the section of the guide devoted to that topic: Working with Community Partners.)

Toward Trauma-Informed Design

Trauma-informed exhibition planning is not a checklist but an evolving process. The aspiration is steady progress: asking with each project, How can we make this space safer, more empowering, and more supportive? By embedding choice, balance, respectful language, regulation spaces, advisories, piloting, collaboration, and creative engagement, museums can be places of both truth-telling and healing.

A small light carried through darkness does not banish the darkness—that would be both impossible and unwise, for in darkness we often find what we need to see. But it offers orientation, companionship, the warmth of human presence. It says: You do not walk alone. We are here together, carrying our lights, finding our way. And perhaps, in the end, this is what trauma-informed practice in museums aspires to: not to eliminate darkness or difficulty, but to ensure that no one moves through it alone, unsupported, without light and movement of their own making.

If I must cross the sea, I will cross the sea. If not, I will wander in unknown places, seeking.

---

Next

Guide Navigation